Total Loss?

by Uthoff » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:25 pm
Posts: 5
Joined: 10 Sep 2008

My vehicle was involved in a collision. High speed chase ending at the rear end of my 2006 Grand Caravan.

Well, adjuster came out and estimated damage to 7800. They told me ACV was 14000. Well, They didn't total the car. I disagree with what the car is worth. I believe it's actually worth a lot less than that. I'm not looking to cheat anybody out of money.

Should i attempt to prove that it was worth less pre accident?
I was hoping they would total it because I have no idea how I am going to sell it or trade it in anywhere now. This guy hit it at 60mph and pushed it over the curb into the neighbors yard.

Does this sound crazy?

I don't really want the car back. The shop told me, "Yeah the rear end was twisted but we can fix it." I think they are crazy. I keep thinking of an aluminum can. Crushing it and how it will never be the same again.

Total Comments: 14

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:01 am Post Subject:

Well, you can express your desire of ‘totaling' the vehicle to the adjuster, and he may even consider the proposal if the cost of repair doesn't differ much from the ACV of the vehicle, but there is no other way to convince the insurance company to “total” the car when it is repairable.

The insurance companies adjudge a vehicle as ‘totaled' when its cost of repair exceeds 75% of its actual cash value. And as long as the cost is below the threshold the insurer may wish to pay for its repair only.

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:09 am Post Subject:

You want to declare the car as totaled when both the body shop and the insurer agree that the car is repairable!!

I believe it's actually worth a lot less than that. I'm not looking to cheat anybody out of money.



I don't think that you are cheating anyone. The insurance adjuster is qualified to evaluate the claims and when (s)he has a reason to believe that the car is worth more then IMO there is no reason to dispute it.

Normally people disagree with the insurers when they undervalue their claims, but it's the first instance when someone is disagreeing because his claim is overvalued :D

~jeremy

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:23 am Post Subject:

Hi Uthoff, you can't pursue the insurer to declare the car as ‘totaled'. Rupert is right, the worth of the damages needs to cross a certain threshold before the car can be deemed totaled. And in this case, the repair cost is around 50% of the ACV of the vehicle, which is fairly within the limit.

I'd like to hear the opinions of the other adjusters of this board on this issue.

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:55 am Post Subject:

I disagree with what the car is worth. I believe it's actually worth a lot less than that

WOW! That's a new one! usually the other way around! :)

Should i attempt to prove that it was worth less pre accident?

NO!

I don't really want the car back. The shop told me, "Yeah the rear end was twisted but we can fix it." I think they are crazy. I keep thinking of an aluminum can. Crushing it and how it will never be the same again.

That's not true, and their not crazy they know what can be repaired and what cannot...

Why don't you just take the repair amount, and sell the vehicle as is? You ought to be able to get 2-3k for it atleast...ask the shop if they want to buy it.... Do you have a loan on it? If so will this amount cover it? You have the option whether or not you repair your vehicle....you do not however have the option to decide if a vehicle is totaled or not, and sounds like it's a long way from a total loss...

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:12 pm Post Subject:

First off, Thanks for all the great info.

About the undervalue of the claim: We did the stupid thing of waiting until after we bought it to pull the carfax on it. It has a sketchy title history. So we've been trying to sell it. But we're afraid now we won't ever be able to get rid of it. Stupid tax as some call call it I guess. It was totally an impulse buy.

I've been struggling with how they decide this. We've had the car up for sale. And we've dropped the price 3 times because we're getting no calls about it.

About the shop and adjuster: The adjuster said he had no idea yet because he had to wait until it was up on a rack. The car was not sitting straight because it had all flat tires and the rear axle was sitting underneath the rear seat instead of the wheel well.

And when I noticed the car had been moved I went to the shop to see what they were doing. He said,"It's in that garage over there." He never showed me the car after I asked. He acted like he didn't hear me. I really got the feeling from him that he didn't want to show it to me. The way he handled it was very shady. His attitude has got me scared that they may just be looking for a quick payday. He has yet to call the ins. co. even after he told me that he's already found other stuff accident related. He just kept saying don't worry we'll take care of it.

So, I called the company and related this to them. They seemed very concerned. So, I called the shop per the company and stopped work now that it was on the rack. Their going to send the adjuster back out. Now that it's on rack.

I hadn't really thought about the option of keeping the money and selling the salvage.

Again, thanks for discussing this with me.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 05:08 am Post Subject:

I don't really want the car back.


My friend, its not always what you want or what not!
If the adjuster is confident that they can fix it...& in case they consider the repair charges to be no where near the ACV then there's not much that you can do actually. Yes, it will never be the same again...but then again you need to understand the conditions for declaring a vehicle to be 'totaled'.

Does this sound crazy?


No, this doesn't sound crazy till the point of time accidents of varying force & magnitude would keep on occurring in this wonderful world. If someone could drive faster to break through the walls of a rural country school killing children...then this one seems a lot easier in comparison!
Regards, ArindamSenIndies

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 08:09 am Post Subject:

Should i attempt to prove that it was worth less pre accident?



Now, how would you go about it?
I'd rather say that this is something that sounds crazy to me that the kind of accident. You can't just hope to get it totaled simply because you don't know what to do with it anymore.

See, this is a time when a growing awareness of the fraud-busting measures is getting prominence all over the insurance industry. This could be a real good reason why you need to think twice before you ought to fake things out of nowhere. All the best! Evan

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 09:14 am Post Subject:

Are you saying it has a prior salvage title? If so that greatly drops the value of the vehicle...if it totals they will figure that out...do you owe anything on it? If so will 8k or better cover it or do you have GAP ins?

Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 04:50 pm Post Subject:

We're covered on the total. We just really don't want it back. I guess if they fix it there will be a great deal on a Grand Caravan here in town ;-)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it should have a salvage title on it. It's been in and out of Texas at least 3 times. But I would have a hard time proving that one.


Caveat Emptor. I should have been more thorough when we bought it. Lesson learned.

Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:14 am Post Subject:

You'll be much smarter the next one you buy :wink:

Add your comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.