My son was driving

by hummingbird » Mon Dec 31, 2007 04:29 pm

My son was driving another friend's vehicle. He pulled out of a parking space and did not see the low vehicle beside him and swiped it. He found out later that the car he was driving had no insurance and they wanted my son's insurance to cover that vehicle. Can that be done? Because he ended up in court and he was released from the claim but my son's insurance went against his advise to not pay the claim and paid it anyway .Then they raised his rates.How can they do that. His rates got so high he lost it because he could not pay it.

Total Comments: 18

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 09:03 pm Post Subject:

Your son was operating the vehicle... I think it should be clear that he can be held responsible for his actions.

In most states, the own of the vehicle will be primary as they assume the risk of the driver they allowed to operate the vehicle. But even then, the driver is also responsible, it's just that his legal liability is in excess of the owners. In some states, the driver is primary and the owner cannot be held liable in most cases.

Regardless, if the owner of the vehicle does not have insurance, your son's insurance would then _protect your son's interest_ in the use of the vehicle and pay the claim.

Courts don't "release" people from liability. I'm guessing perhaps your son was issued a citation and that was dismissed?

People cannot control the insurance companies. If they could, very few claims would get paid. But those same people who don't want their carriers to pay would probably still want the carrier to pay for their defense when a suit was filed against then and/or the judgement against them once they lost. See my point? Your son caused the damage to the other vehicle, he is legally liable for that damage, so his carrier paid the claim.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:29 am Post Subject:

tcope has answered your question fully but I'd like to throw a couple of other points in as well...

Can that be done?

yes, of course

...Because he ended up in court

why? why would he be in court? Did he leave the scene? or do you mean the owner of the vehicle was in court?

but my son's insurance went against his advise to not pay the claim and paid it anyway .

(as tcope mentioned) you, me or no one can just tell their insurance company not to pay a claim..they are contractually and legally bound to cover certain things (this amoung them, your son driving an uninsured vehicle and damaging an innocently parked car)...and why wouldn't you (or your son) want them to? I'm really confused by that, he hit the parked car right? the parked car did nothing wrong correct? you son (not the owner of the vehicle) made a mistake, and caused damage to another why would you (or son) not feel a legal and moral obligation to repair this poor persons vehicle? I don't understand your line of thought here (telling or advising his ins company not to pay for the damages) I understand that the vehicle should've been insured and had it been that policy would've paid the damage, but it wasn't insured, and your son did cause the damage...please explain your thought process here...

Then they raised his rates.How can they do that.

Because he had an 'at fault' accident that they had to pay out for....and ''if'' he left the scene, that would (in some states and companies) add even more insurance 'points'.....

His rates got so high he lost it because he could not pay it

I'm guessing this wasn't the only accident/claim, or ticket, because the first rate increase for a violation shouldn't have been more than 20-25%....does this mean hummingbird that he is now driving uninsured? If so, he is flirting with disaster! seriously, and if he is a minor or your name is ANYWHERE near the title to his vehicle so are you...You wouldn't belive the number of young people that I have seen with huge judgements against them that they have to carry for years until it's paid off...jobs they can't get, I could go on and on the damage this can cause in a persons life, and some parents, also losing financially what they have worked and built most of their lives for, just by a child getting involved in an accident and being uninsured....something to think about...

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:26 am Post Subject:

I would think that he would be responsible, and if he did not have insurance and he was driving a car without insurance, I would expect him to pay for my damages out of his pocket. He was driving, period........ he is responsible.

How many people would just say "oh well, not my problem" if it were this easy, god help us who do carry insurance, can you imagine what our rates would be like just to cover the uninsured person who says, "I am going to drive regardless, insurance or no insurance". I don't think that is even fair to the rest of the insured world to even think that way. Driving is a privilidge and along with that privilidge comes responsibility like car insurance, registration, plates, having a valid license and Yes, having the common sense to know if the car or vehicle that you are driving or riding in has insurance on it also. You would not walk around pulling the trigger on a pistol, saying, "Gee, wonder if there are any bullets in this gun? Click, Click, Booooooooooooooom!" Same deal to me, if you are going to operate it, you better know where the insurance cards and financial information is on the vehicle in case of an accident or you get pulled over by the police. If you just jump in and go, you get what you deserve. This mindset of mine comes from paying "INSURANCE"

I am sorry to see that your son's insurance went up to the point of not being able to afford it and I know the feeling, I had an increase this year and did not even have a claim, in fact, have not had a claim in over 12 years and my rates got raised. I am just a little perturbed with my insurance company right now over this. Maybe your son could shop around and see what other companies have out there and get a liability policy that would not cost as much. As mentioned above, it will depend on his driving record and what else he has on his license. The insurance industry is one that will make you pay the piper, that is for sure.

I am not being mean, just direct.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 01:54 am Post Subject:

Thats what I mean. I think there should be limits set on what insurance companies are allowed to charge people.I don't think it should be legal to raise rates on people who have never even made a claim. My son was behind the wheel but the owner was there beside him and told him he could drive.No my son has insurance now with another company but it is all he is able to pay he has nothing left after.The car he hit was someone he knew also.That pulled into the space after he got nehind the wheel.I am jusy seeing an unfortunate accident.Like he says he is learning the hard way the ways of insurance.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 02:35 am Post Subject:

Unfortunately this will be a lessoned learn by your son, hopefully he does learn from it, too bad his insurance will be raised because of it. I feel bad that you are worried so about it, I posted some things on your other thread in reference to his insurance, hopefully there will be a cheaper solution for him. How much damage was actually done? Just curious, I guess since it was already reported it really does not matter, I just wonder if he could have taken care of the damage out of pocket and kept the insurance company out of the equation he may have been better off, I hope that you find a solution some how, some way for you son to be able to drive, he has to drive to work to pay his bills, hang in there I am sure that a solution will be worked out here, too many good heads here full of ideas not to.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 06:34 am Post Subject:

Thats what I mean. I think there should be limits set on what insurance companies are allowed to charge people.

Insurance companies are required to submit rate increases to the state for approval.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:17 am Post Subject:

Thats what I mean. I think there should be limits set on what insurance companies are allowed to charge people

There are!

I don't think it should be legal to raise rates on people who have never even made a claim.

did you say in some other threads that your son has some tickets and also hit a deer?

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 05:12 pm Post Subject:

He is 21 soon to be 22 next month. As with a lot of teens when he started driving he got a few tickets ,much to our dismay.A couple of minor mishaps also.Yes, he also hit a deer as we live in a rural area of Ky.He has not gotten a ticket for a while now so I am assuming that all but maybe one have fallen off his driving record. I am really hoping that his rates will drop some when he goes to renew. He did all this years ago but seems to be still effecting his rates.He did switch insurance companies as the one we all had got to expensive for him. It took him a while to learn the hard way about the tickets. I got a ticket once about a yr ago.I was driving 72 in a 55.I was heart sick .I had on a new pair of shoes and could not get the feel of the gas peddle. Before I realized it there was the cop with the lights spinning. I certainly could not afford that, so I went and told them my reason. Because I have a clean driving record no tickets ever ,they forgave it! I am encourageing him to go back to get a new quote from our insurance agency. Maybe it will be cheaper now.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 05:15 pm Post Subject:

Insurance companies are required to submit rate increases to the state for approval.


Then why does the state allow low income families who need their cars and insurance to have to pay so much for that privilige. I liked it better better before it was a law you had to have insurance.

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 06:19 pm Post Subject:

When was automobile insurance not required.... 1940? :)

The state allows it because the insurance industry pays lobbiest millions of dollars every year to influence polititians to do what they want. I never said it was fair.

If you ran an insurance company and your job dependend on making the most money, wouldn't you do the same?

Also, there is competition out there. That keeps prices lower.

But also insurance companies get screwed into having to pay claims that should not be owed (via fraud and the court systems).

Add your comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.