Sometimes isn't it good to have an atty T-scope? My case is pretty complex and not having an atty scared the heck out of me once I seen that I was going to be left with a lifetime disability. I do agree there are plenty of times that an adjuster doeas have to play hard ball. Some attys proabaly have the same god complex you are speaking of and should also be shot.
I know a few adjusters like this and I've acted this way on occasion but only to an attorney, never to an unrepresented person.
Very few times have I had to harsh, and many times I have been thrilled to pieces when a difficult person says they are getting an attorney... By difficult I mean someone that truely doesn't understand what can be paid for and what cannot, but they THINK they know everything..and won't listen...those people, I welcome an atty rep letter from.
I agree whole heartedly, most atty, I have no trouble with at all in fact they are a breeze in most cases...(except the ones that just passed the bar )
Some real complex cases I agree need an atty...the ones I hate to see get rep'd are the ones (injured party) that in the end actually end up with less than I would've settled it for after their atty takes his/her piece of the pie. _________________ Have you been helped by a poster? Do you want to show your appreciation? YOU CAN !! Just simply click on the donate button and send them some coin!
YES!!!!! I'd say whenever the injuries are severe enough that an average person does not have any idea what the settlement amount should be or at least as there is enough room for a higher settlement to pay the attorneys 33% fee. Especially when these cases make it much easier on the injured party.
As an adjuster I've had _very_ few adjusters become rude. It just does not happen. I'd say it's around .0001%.
)
