Homeowners Help!

Message Author
ampm-bookmark
delicious-small Add to del.icio.us
yahoomyweb-small Add to YahooMyWeb
simpy-small Add to Simpy
blinklist-small Add to BlinkList
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:32 am   Post subject:   

You're adjuster is stupid..i think that's the answer....if i'm understanding this right he SHOULD have paid you..2300.00 (parts and material) less your deductible or 1800.00 somehow he got his wires screwed up and paid you minus the entire amount...tick a lock and get to the bank son you just made about 500 bucks.. Laughing
_________________
"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Lori
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8173

Location: Missouri
287.90 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:56 pm   Post subject:   

Lori - remember that the deductible for this loss was most likely taken during the original claim for the roof damage. I suspect that they took out the O/P as the insured may not use a GC to complete the work and do it themselves. Depending on the state and carrier, this would seem correct.
Dasfuk
Senior member
Leave a quick message

Dasfuk
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 597

Location: Ohio
24.03 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:20 am   Post subject:   

Good catch Das, you're right the deductible was already taken...so in that case, the adjuster did the exact correct thing...(sorry unknown adjuster that i called you stupid.. Wink ) by backing out overhead and profit.
_________________
"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Lori
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8173

Location: Missouri
287.90 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:26 am   Post subject: HUH?  

So taking out overhead and profit is normal? I guess where I'm confused is if I had hired said company they would have had to pay 2300.00 (which includes approx 500.00 in overhead and profit), but if I do it myself they get to pay 1800.00? I guess I don't see why they would not pay me what they would have to pay someone else to fix it. Am I considered cheap labor? : )
jeepnmatt
New member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 7


4.85 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:54 pm   Post subject:   

Quote:
So taking out overhead and profit is normal?
yes, you are NEVER entitled to profit from an insurance claim (as the insured or claimant) and you have no overhead..
Quote:
I guess I don't see why they would not pay me what they would have to pay someone else to fix it. Am I considered cheap labor? : )
Yes you are cheap labor, but they should be paying you labor but NOT profit.
_________________
"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Lori
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8173

Location: Missouri
287.90 Dollars($)

Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body
All times are GMT
 Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2


Get Free Insurance Quote
*State:
*Insurance type:

Ask Community Experts

flash plugin

Quick Links
Must See
Community
Insurance on Facebook
Hot topics in forums

Latest in blogs



Page loaded in 0.282 seconds.