Hi Sizzling Members - Famous Controversies

by Lucasto » Wed Nov 07, 2007 09:41 pm

Letz discuss the famous known Controversies...
Come on everyone letz get rite into this interesting Topic.
Will be posting everday a Famous Controversy. So Keep a close track on this Topic.

Total Comments: 9

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 05:58 pm Post Subject:

Lucasto,

Interesting thought on controversy, should get some action. Please, however, do the rest of us a favor...

Letz discuss the famous known Controversies...
Come on everyone letz get rite into this interesting Topic.
Will be posting everday a Famous Controversy. So Keep a close track on this Topic.



"Letz" is spelled "let's" It's a contraction for "let us."
"Rite" is spelled "right" and
"everday" is spelled "everyday."

Credibility is a huge issue in these threads, and spelling/grammar, etc. is a large part of one's credibility. Can we please take a moment and go over our posts to ensure a little bit of accuracy?

Thanks...it's just a thing with me, and most of the other posters I think will agree...

InsTeacher 8)

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:06 pm Post Subject:

Ins Teacher is right on target Lucasto, (thanks by the way Ins.T :wink: ).. It is very difficult if not impossible to get most of the 'regulars' to respond to threads or posts that appear to be posted without much thought behind them. Especially as to their legibility. Or even worse a post or thread that appear to be posted simply to increase posting numbers :twisted: :evil: (this is very bad very very bad!). I suspect that english isn't your first language, if that's the case, slow down, and please take your time. You'll do fine, and get a much better response... :)

Now what is your first controversy? I know, how about the controversy surrounding, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation on forums? Just kidding! :roll:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 06:08 pm Post Subject: Hmmmmm

Its indeed surprising and interesting that ive found people focusing so much on Grammar. Its better we focus on our interesting thread rather than on Credibility or Accuracy. Well well another fact is that i dont feel the urgency for being perfect with capitalization and punctuations. As long as people are happy reading my posts its not a problem at all.

Dear Lori, hmmmm guess you gotta pick up some pace rather than slowing me down.
krazee !!! now whats that ??? Surelly its Crazy.

Will be posting my first Famous Controversy very soon. And trust me everyone will enjoy it to the atmost.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 07:59 pm Post Subject: The Moon Landing Hoax Controversy

The moon landing hoax controversy is still evident after 36 years. On July 20th, 1969 our lives changed forever. This was not due to any disastrous event that took place here on Earth, but an amazing event that took place in the heavens, when the first man walked on that wondrous thing people had gazed at and wondered about for centuries - the moon. Our world was changing at that time in leaps and bounds. It was a time of endless possibilities because we were just getting use to the invention of TV. We were amazed by what TV was showing us. Many people think of this as a moon landing hoax or the first man on the moon hoax. In spite of all the evidence to the contrary, some people still believe that the landing of a man on the moon was a trick of television.

- Shadows on the Moon

One of the arguments from skeptics to substantiate the moon landing hoax theory involves the shadows that illuminated from the lunar surface when the pictures that were sent back to us. They argue that if this is not a hoax, why is it that facts about the moon state there are no shadows in space. This argument about this moon landing hoax comes from believers that feel the sun is the only source of light in the universe. When you think of the moon, you must consider that the sun is not the only source of light on the moon and that the lunar surface reflects its own light which illuminates all things on the surface. Therefore there is no credence in the theory of a moon landing hoax.

- The Fluttering Flag

Another part of the moon landing hoax theory deals with the American flag. The picture that was sent back showed this flag fluttering as in a wind. Some believers in the moon landing hoax feel that this was proof that this picture had been taken on earth and not the result of a moon landing. The fact that the flag flutters in the wind when there is no wind on the moon could lend some degree of credibility to the belief that this was a hoax. However, experts, in an attempt to defend the landing against the moon landing hoax theory explained that a vacuum has no friction. On the moon things don't stop moving as quickly as they do on Earth, so when the astronauts got the flag attached to the surface and straightened, it stayed there longer than what we are accustomed to. Hence the picture was taken with the flag waving is proof that the moon landing hoax theory is incorrect.

- Driving the Rover

The pictures of the astronauts driving the Rover also proved to many that this was a moon landing hoax However, the projection of the speed of a film showing the astronauts driving in the moon proves that it really did happen. There were no clouds of dust rinsing from the tires of the Rover because moon dust returns directly to the surface. Therefore it was not possible back in 1969 to have this type of controlled environment in which to display a moon landing hoax.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 08:10 pm Post Subject:

Hello, Hello
I think I've been plugged into the wrong channel or something.
I really think there is a shadow over my moon rover. :oops:

This is an "Insurance Community" where people ask questions about "Insurance", get help with "Insurance", or respond to "Insurance" related topics.

Please, stay on topic.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 08:23 pm Post Subject:

Dont worry Maze, the rocket would not be able to relaunch, landed forever. ;)

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 01:19 am Post Subject:

Dear Lori, hmmmm guess you gotta pick up some pace rather than slowing me down.
krazee !!! now whats that ??? Surelly its Crazy.

What in the hell do these sentences (?) mean?

Simmer Ins. Maze, he's in the Pub, doesn't have to be ''on topic'' here.....

Anyone else notice that ''controversy'' is clearly a cut and paste?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 06:38 pm Post Subject: This is Lucasto...

Yup definately lakemen the rocket is grounded.

Frankly speaking was NOT keen on the Prize of 1st place. But am definately sure that all my post were viewed the most number of times. And i posted all of them in the right category (The Pub).

- Definately in the right place.

In fact my motivation to post more Jokes and interesting topics was due to the overwhelming viewing numbers that many members would read my posts.

My motive was definately in favour of growing up the network, And making ampminsure an well known site blended with different flavours.

Lori am extremely sorry if you felt hurt in anyway. But would request u to think about other peoples feelings too before posting any matter.

ALL THE BEST to you all !!! :-)

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 06:37 pm Post Subject: The Pub

Lucasto, I must apologize for your posting in "The Pub". I was not familiar with this area of the community and did not realize that it was advertised as "anything off topic".

I'm not really sure why this section is here, but I guess we could discuss anything from alligator birth control to zebra striping.

So again, I apologize to everyone.

Add your comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.