| Message |
Author |
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 pm Post subject: Discrimination against pitbulls? |
|
|
Me and my sister are arguing, she claims that homeowners insurance discriminates against pitbulls with higher fees and because of the more likelihood of an animal attack or property damage. Is this true ?
_________________
Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
Wolfganged
Guest
|
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not sure I would call it discrimination. Many insurance companies do not want to insure a home where a pit bull lives. The likelihood of a pit bull biting the neighbor versus a poodle for instance is quite a bit higher. |
|
JeffDavisIns
New member
Joined: 23 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
Location: Jennings, LA
1.13 Dollars($)
|
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 2:11 pm Post subject: pit bulls |
|
|
They are one of 7 breeds that most companies will not insure or charge an extra pemium for. What was the last fatal poodle attack you read about?
_________________
Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
1951
Guest
|
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:57 am Post subject: pitbulls |
|
|
Actually it is discrimination, especially since pitbulls don't even rank in the top 20 for reported bites or attacks. A dalmatian and a golden retriever more than triple reported dog bites as co pared to pitbulls.
_________________
Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
eric s
Guest
|
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Odd, the Center for Disease control would beg to differ. Pit Bulls have been rated #1.
However, they have since stopped recording this info.
"Animal control departments in at least 23 U.S. states report that pit bulls are biting more than all other dog breeds. These states include: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin. The oft-quoted myth by pro-pit bull groups that pit bulls "do not bite more than other breeds" is categorically false. In addition to leading bite counts, the pit bull bite is also the most damaging, inflicting permanent and disfiguring injury."
The issue is only partly with with the dog. The bigger issue is the owner and why they have the dog.
Insurance companies also keep records of dog bite claims. There is a reason why they don't want the liability. |
|
tcope
Forum Expert
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 5199
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
286.08 Dollars($)
|
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's discrimination. That's what insurance companies do. They discriminate against prospects & applicants based on their selection criteria. But it is not UNFAIR discrimination.
As long as all pit bull owners have the same options, and are treated the same way, it is not unfair discrimination.
Some insurance companies, like State Farm, do not deny offering you home insurance coverage based on dog breed. I think Allstate may do this as well.
The exception, I believe, is Ohio, where state law considers pit bulls a dangerous weapon? Or something like that.
_________________
You can save $100s on car & home insurance, but you have to shop to find the company saving you money. See complaints, & customer satisfaction ratings for all the leading insurance companies at: http://www.smartshopyourcarinsurance.com |
|
Robert742
Preferred member
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 123
12.75 Dollars($)
|
|
