What is covered in Part D comprehensive loss

Message Author
ampm-bookmark
delicious-small Add to del.icio.us
yahoomyweb-small Add to YahooMyWeb
simpy-small Add to Simpy
blinklist-small Add to BlinkList
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:48 pm   Post subject: What is covered in Part D comprehensive loss  

my mom loaned her car to someone for 3 days. After 60 days, she repeatedly asked for the car back; she sent a registered 5 day demand for the car that was returned unclaimed. When she was finally able to get the car back, the interior was trashed and the car was mechanically totaled--the mechanic reported it as undrivable...Would this be considered for a comprehensive claim. Thanks!
saabie
New member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 2


1.27 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:17 pm   Post subject: loaned vehicle totaled  

it depends on your insurance policy; if the car is totaled mechanically, and you have proof of your attempt to recind your largess, you may have a claim. best bet is to contact your insurance company.
GulfCoastGirl
New member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 2


1.07 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:18 am   Post subject:   

Coverage will depend on the cause of the damage. Was it vandalized? By whom?
_________________
You can save $100s on car & home insurance, but you have to shop to find the company saving you money. See complaints, & customer satisfaction ratings for all the leading insurance companies at: http://www.smartshopyourcarinsurance.com
Robert742
Preferred member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 123


12.75 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:29 am   Post subject:   

according to the legal definition of vandalisim..yes, but it was by a person known to her, so pressing charges is not an option.
saabie
New member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 2


1.27 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:42 am   Post subject:   

I replied in another thread not seeing the the OP started more then one. One issue is if the insurance company considers the person a permissive user. If so, they are an insured. Can an insured cause damage to the vehicle and have it covered?

As mentioned in this thread, its really up to the carrier.
tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Forum Expert
tcope
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 5199

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
286.08 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:34 am   Post subject:   

I may not be correct, but I really don't think that intentional damage to any property is covered by the insurers.

In this case the person who borrowed the car was, as tcope says, an insured. Thus, if the insured damaged the interior of the car, the claim would be most probably turned down. Comprehensive coverage won't work here.

Only an angel of an insurer would cover that ( so do I think)
Monawayne
Preferred member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 119

Location: Arizona
11.98 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:57 pm   Post subject:   

I'm leaning both ways on this (more toward no coverage as most carriers 1) don't want to pay if it looks like they may not need to and 2) because it was the insured's actions that lead the the damage).

This could be considered a theft by conversion. If it's considered a theft then the damage is either a result of theft of a result of vandalism. If a theft by conversion then the person is no longer an insured. The big problem with this is that no police report was filed in the meantime. HUGE mistake on the owners part (and ranks up there with loaning the car out to someone). As such, who is to say that the info from the insured is even true?

But I think there is about a 95% chance the claim would be denied as there is confirmation that the vehicle was given freely and there was no police report for theft and (or therefore) no good indication that this turned into a theft situation.

OP.. a letter to the person telling them to return the car was really no the best move. As I've mentioned, a police report for the theft of the car would have been a _much_ smarter move. It's what most people would have done. As such, this is really going to look like the car was loaned to someone and returned damaged. This is not what insurance is for. It's more of a "life lesson"... i.e. don't loan your car out to shady people.
tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Forum Expert
tcope
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 5199

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
286.08 Dollars($)

Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1


Get Free Auto Insurance Quote
*State:

Ask Community Experts

flash plugin

Quick Links
Must See
Community
Insurance on Facebook
Hot topics in forums

Latest in blogs



Page loaded in 0.210 seconds.