Accident settlement: Factors that determine your claim

by Guest » Thu May 15, 2008 04:49 am
Guest

Hi!
I am hoping someone can help me on this!
I was involved in an accident on Dec. 1 07. I was rearended by a Hummer going approx 45 mph. My minivan had approx 11,500 in damage (it is a custom 07 Sienna) and I had a rental car for 12 weeks. After the accident, I had to take my 4 kids (ages 6,4, 2, 6 mths) to the er and then one to the pediatrician 4 days later. Two were treated with whiplash and had chiro for about 5 months. Medical bills totaled 2950. Lost wages to take the kids were approx 680, diminished value on my vehicle is about 4K. They also didn't pay the car rental bill for 6 weeks and it was charged to me so I paid an over the limit fee and lost my 0% promotional rate due to default (even though the charge has been reversed.) The insurance company offered me an accident settlement of 2,150 and then they were going to pay the 1500 of chiro (there is a lein and that is included in the 2950) I told them I was looking for around 16300 (four times medical bills, 4K in diminished value, lost wages and over the limit fee.) Am I asking too much? They told me I was being unreasonable and that Missouri doesn't recognize diminished value. My insurance company says they do. What is a fair accident settlement amount?

Total Comments: 123

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 05:48 pm Post Subject: Gee now I am getting depressed reading about your work

I like this one in particular, it substantiates what I tell a lot of people when communicating with adjusters. I tell them to get it in writing they are just reading from scripts. Make them show you in your policy regarding what they are denying. Just like Paint caps. No not the ones you wear on your head, these are arbitray thresholds insurers like to tell shops and customers that are all that is allowed to repair your car. They get discounts on parts, and their preferred shops have to pay for paint and supplies out of their own profits which are dwindling. Just like the hail damage job in my shop now that the insurer felt only needed to have 450 dollar worth of paint material and bodyshop supplies when in reality it will take over a thousand dollars worth of product to do the job right. And shops are waiting in line to get on these programs. :roll:

Job Security: If you never make mistake or accidently misread one of the 200 prewritten scripts you will not be fired.




-

35Pay -4
Respect -5
Benefits -4
Job Security -5
Work/Life Balance -5
Career Potential/Growth -5
Location 3
Co-worker Competence -5
Work Environment -5
Virginia Beach 05/23/2008: I have worked a Geico for a little more than four years now and I have to agree with just about everything I have read here. I don't think that there could possibly be a more evil, irresponsible, or morally corrupt company still in existence than this one.
Pay: Your checks don't bounce but you'll never get rich or even live comfortably on the salary.
Respect: You will hear about it in orientation but will never see it.
Benefits: Same as any other company
Job Security: If you never make mistake or accidently misread one of the 200 prewritten scripts you will not be fired.
Work/Life Balance: Work odd hours/days that allow no time for a Life
Career Potential: If you can read scripts and avoid answering any direct questions you will keep your job
Growth Potential: Exists only for the lovers, mistresses, brown nosers, compulsive liars and those creative enough to hide their file errors.
Location: Great. Too bad that Pay/Salary will never allow you to live anywhere near
CoWorker Competence: There are three kinds of co workers 1) Those who can read scripts but know nothing that are quickly promoted 2) Those who know stuff but have trouble reading everything they say from a prewritten script are fired 3) Those who can do neither of the above but sleep with management become supervisors and managers themselves
Work Environment: Take a cockroach infested Nike Sweat shop in Malaysia. Remove the five year olds. Insert computers that were salvaged from the local incinerator and what do you have? An improvement over current GEICO conditions.

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 02:13 pm Post Subject:

Just another insurance HAWKER NOT HOCKER extolling the virtues of parts they do not install and don't get to hear the commentary from the employees because a disgruntled employee could harm the shops dependence on the insurance referals

Just for the record Mike, in that time span (since 1986) four years was spent working in a LARGE body shop...so I do know from wense I speak....I was NOT working for an insurance company then...and you know this...I

bet you didn't even know that there is a report that there is contamination of radioactive isotopes in chinese steel which is used in the production of sheet metal parts. It's not okay to let kids play with lead based painted toys that are imported from China, but it's okay to expose american workers to the hazards of these parts and the consumers to losses in value from their use.

Here we go with the drama queen stuff again :roll: Another conspiracy theorirst I knew it!

Go ahead put on taiwan sheetmetal drag our economy further in the ground and support some country that may someday control us.

Dude seriously you should write those dime store romance novels...

Shops that say there are no problems with these parts are mandated to use a certain percentage on their grade cards or risk losing their place on the insurance teat.

Once again spouting more crap...The company I work fors DRP contract says not one single word about this...no percentages etc....course I've been doing this for many years, (but as Mike is fond of saying), 'what do I know'?

Not a very good representative example of honest opinions of these parts

See again told you any shop that is a DRP doesn't know a damn thing right Mike? They don't know how to repair a car near as good as you, their opinion isn't worth the spit it took to muster if it doesn't spout the ins company hater retoric you do...then have no gonads and you refer to them as whores...sure seems to me that the vast majority of these (in your words) testitular lacking prositutes are doing fine to me! Maybe they don't grow real men where you're from, but in my part of the state these guys have no problem telling me if they have an issue with ANYTHING...see we have a good 'working relationship' and are honest and open with each other,. behave like grown ups...you might want to try it some time.... :roll:

How does it make you feel knowing a Chinese company is using kids in the production of parts you mandate.

What kind of t.v.'s do you own Mike, what about stereos, dvds, cameras? Poor little babies making them too? I mean it dime store romance novels...you've really missed your calling!

I am sorry if I am making your life miserable

(again) Don't flatter yourself Mike, you don't have that kind of power....

After reading just a few posts on that board, I began to think I better leave posting here for the weekend. I don't want to be the one to cause Lori and T to go postal or have to seek treatment for stress.

But again you didn't (you are on line this very second! :roll: )...wonder why? No insured's to SAVE this weekend Mike? You know that Jobvent is just that a place to vent, and insurance adjusters are not the only ones on that site...and who cares anyway, it's a ''vent'' ''rant'' site, much like you've attempted to make this one... :roll:

This person was so upset at the insurance industry that they quit and went to work for another one.

:lol: :wink: great point tcope!

They get discounts on parts, and their preferred shops have to pay for paint and supplies out of their own profits which are dwindling.

More bull, again all (most) drp programs do not receive parts discounts....there is no such thing as a paint 'cap', and all can be adjusted based on the job...period...how do you know so much when you are too good to be (asked to be) a drp Mike?

Just like the hail damage job in my shop now that the insurer felt only needed to have 450 dollar worth of paint material and bodyshop supplies when in reality it will take over a thousand dollars worth of product to do the job right

And most 'grown ups' would call the adjuster, and say, 'hey, think you might've made a mistake here, got time to go over this?' the adjuster would then respond, 'yep, what's up?' then within five minute the balance would be on the way...Careful Mike, I think ''they'' are watching you...better hunker down in your bunker...

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 02:33 pm Post Subject:

Well my vintage car show was rained out, so I guess I'll have time to dispell the rants and distortions of Lori today.

As usual Lori speaking about things she has no clue because whe works for one of the better companies she says. She has no idea of how bad some of those other companies operate. I know of only three companies that consistently do not hawk a/m sheetmetal. Statefarm, Chubb, and possibly Amica. State Farm does insist on the use of those a/m radiators and condensers that void the transferable warranty.

I could send you a copy of that St louis estimate where they gave the insurer 778.00 dollars off their ticket for the privelege of having a referal agreement with them.

You are wrong about paint caps, would like me to send you a copy of that as well. I could post them here if you like.

If you worked for one of these other companies for a couple weeks, you too would probably be over at Jobvent complaining.

As far as all those DRP's not complaining, why are their state and national organizations trying to get legistlation passed to prohibit insurers from abusing estimating guides to their favor; attempting to get anti=steering legislation passed because they are losing work to shops that can still afford to pass on ever increasing payola or parts discounts to insurers; cease to attempt steering customers to those preferred shops.

Why are these association leaders complaining and pushing back insurers because of their manipulation of an industry to which they are not part of.
Why do they want legislation to prohibit capping. Insurers in other states that were prohibited from capping, no problem for them, they simply call it a preset threshold. Now the shop has to help the consumer get paid for the materials the insurer is trying to not pay for. Those independent shops know that the insurer is not their customer and are able to help consumers receive what is owed them without negotiating on their behalf. We know the insurer doesn't owe us one thin dime, but they do owe the vehicle owner. If they fail t pay what is owed, it's called bad faith. ooooh thats a scary one that carries penalties.

Whore is one of those potty mouth words that you use. I used the term prostitute themelves. I noticed you were checking my homepage, Are you stalking me again?

You got me wondering about how many web sites I show up on concerning DV...Turns out two out of fifteen more lies from lori. If you can't silence your critics attempt to discredit and destroy them. That must be something you learn in your training. Adjusters always attempt to place wedges between insureds and shops to paint the repair industry as crooks.

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 03:15 pm Post Subject:

because whe works for one of the better companies she says.

Where did I say that? I have said I work for one of the top four...and they are doing just fine by me...but never said one of the better ones...how would i know? :roll: oh yeah...i do!

use of those a/m radiators and condensers that void the transferable warranty

I'll put in in caps for you Mike...LIES LIES AND MORE OUT AND OUT BALD FACED LIES!

could send you a copy of that St louis estimate where they gave the insurer 778.00 dollars off their ticket for the privelege of having a referal agreement with them.

POST IT! and remember to post the agreement showing they are REQUIRED to....also I didn't say that NO carriers required a parts discount (if that is what you mean), but that MOST do not...but yeah, post it...it won't get blocked...St. Louis huh? That's all you could come up with? When this happens EVER time? Had to go nearly 300 miles away? hmmmmm...

You are wrong about paint caps, would like me to send you a copy of that as well. I could post them here if you like.

Yep please do you and I both know that it's illegal to ''cap'' anything...and that it may be preloaded into an estimated program, but is easily changed, I do it weekly...all it is set for is so that the writer (adjuster) will be flagged...and as I said, it's handled easily with a phone call...oh wait 'you' don't talk to adjusters right?

If you worked for one of these other companies for a couple weeks, you too would probably be over at Jobvent complaining.

Well no I'd be spending my time trying to find another job, instead of spinning my wheels on a rant site, that does absolutely no good for anyone! I've told my kids this too from an early age, Life gaurantees you a chance not a fair shake, if you're unhappy it's YOUR repsonsibility to change it...so no, I wouldn't be on jobvent...I'd be using my time productively trying to better my circumstance...

As far as all those DRP's not complaining, why are their state and national organizations trying to get legistlation passed to prohibit insurers from abusing estimating guides to their favor;

Just what state and national organizations are you talking about Mike? and what 'estimating guides are you talking about?

attempting to get anti=steering legislation passed because they are losing work to shops that can still afford to pass on ever increasing payola or parts discounts to insurers; cease to attempt steering customers to those preferred shops.

I agree that there is (with some companies) a steering issue...however from what I've seen there have been great strides (for you) in this area...I dont agree with steering never have, I do agree (as you claim) that the owner should be well informed of their choices...Now if they are told that we have certain shops that we back their work with an additional warranty, they have agreed to get your vehicle in and out quickly etc...then the owner makes the call to go to that shop, then fine...personally I would too if I didn't know much about collision repair, I would go to the shop that I can get two warranties from (one from the shop one from the ins. carrier)...I would also assume that these shops have met some type of criteria to be included in this drp program, ie certain equipment requirements, ins limits etc...i really have seen a 'different' type of 'script' used in order to 'assure' that there is no 'appearance' of steering ..this should bring you some comfort...(i'm not being sacastic this time :wink: , i really have seen a change in the past two years, especially the past six months)....

they simply call it a preset threshold.

I think that's what our state prefers...As a side note here I don't know if you are aware of this or not and frankly I'm thrilled about it, (again this time not being sacastic)...but mitchell's recent upgrade, has the capability (not actually on 'my' lap top, but did use it twice, with great success the shops and I both found it much more equitible mostly for the shop of course, but I want to pay what is due, hopefully it will 'trickle down' to us little fellas soon) that you can input the paint code, and it will actually do a
''true'' material calculation based on that code...which is WAY SO MUCH better than the refinish hour system we've used forever...you and I both know that every single color doesn't cost the same...some times your over paid some times under paid...I personally hope this catches on and we can move forward calculating paint and material this way....(before you go there, yes there is markup added)...

Whore is one of those potty mouth words that you use

Do you really want me to copy and paste your posts from other sites Mike?

I noticed you were checking my homepage, Are you stalking me again

Nope did that AFTER I'd seen you'd checked mine!!!!! If I wanted to be 'stealth' about it Mike I wouldn't have been logged in!!! geeeeeeze help help the paranoids are after you again! (back to sarcasim)

you can't silence your critics attempt to discredit and destroy them.

You've done a great job of discrediting yourself here Mike, all we have had to do is point out your lies and half truths...I don 't want to distroy you (or anyone else) just want you to take a look at what you are doing, and to tell the truth the whole truth for a change! you're wrong (or maybe it was the day I don't understand the google stuff)...about the 2 out of 15...

Adjusters always attempt to place wedges between insureds and shops to paint the repair industry as crooks.

And here we go again, did your teachers not teach you that rarely is there an 'always' about anything? That's another untrue statement I have never tried to wedge anything between vehicle owners and shops, in fact the three of us work very well together...I don't paint the repair 'industry' as crooks, only the shop owners and techs that are....but date line (and others) did a good job of that...If you don't have anything to hide, you don't need to worry, if you find (as you have stated before) that agents are saying ugly things about you that are untrue...sue 'em....if 'lots' of folks are saying the same thing...well might want to look at why... :cry:

Why did you double post this last one? Don't want you to think I'm editing you, so if you'd please acknowledge they are identical I'll delete one of them.

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 03:45 pm Post Subject: yes

yes thats correct! one is enough I suppose

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 04:04 pm Post Subject:

I don't see a doublepost that you are speaking of, if there is, it's because I am enjoying my morning drinking coffee with friends and the wireless network caused a glitch.

Sorry not going to chase you documentation today, maybe tomorrow. Those discounts do not show up on insurance estimates, it showed up on the final invoice of the dealership showing a negotiated discount with their insurance partner.

Funny thing, when you get to audit other shops estimates you get to see all the labor discrepencies, shops that get paid for procedures and materials that are capped.

I am glad you posted that statement about capping being illegal. Insurers like to tell shops , I went to bat for you all the way up the corporate ladder but they will not remove that cap. There is no statutes regarding capping although it could be construed to be fraudulent business practices. Then again it isn't my policy or duty to prove my inrurance company is not paying all of a claim that I am not a party to. That is an issue between the policy holder and their insured if they want to. This is why it is stupid for associations to get legislation passed that even mentions that insurers and collision repairs are tied in any way, it will set a precedent that insurers will abuse as usual. Another thing it will do is codify that a drp relationship is legal whereas now it does not. Another thing that the statute requiring insurers to use all of the estimating guides will do is codify the guides or data bases that are always changing to the detriment of collision repairers.

Those issues will never affect me because my customer is not the insurer. The lobbyists of insurers who have deep deep pockets have managed in other states to so dilute legislation designed to protect consumers and shops that they would have been better off having the legislation stopped before signing. Hopefully Missouri will not follow suit with the misguidence of other state associations that have failed.

I might have used your potty mouth term for "prostituting meaning selling yourself for money" instead of the one you used, if I was in a forum that it was considered appropriate. I thought the forum was a little classier, but you prove that wrong with your vitriolic accusations, venoumous falsehoods directed at me.

I told you guys you should have taken the weekend off, now you'll be back at work tomorrow all wore out from trying to paint me ever the misfit. And I didnt go to your web page til I saw you and T and lakemen and about 3 others had a curiosity that drove them to my web page that has nothing on it, before I went to your page. So quit stalking me Lori, gosh, working yourself into a frazzle trying to find dirt on an honest business man so you can coerce and intimidate.

I have a tape recording of a regional claims manager telling me that he is going to tell all my customers that I will not work from his estimates ssimply because I would not agree to cost shift my final invoice so he would not set a precedence that they would pay for a ligitimate procedure.
Why would I want to fight a huge corporation that would hire people like you to discredit me for being an honest businessmen who believes his customer is the vehicle owner.

I'll scan those docs for you tomorrow or the next day when I get time.

On the matter of paint and materials, many paint companies use an averaging system to price their paint. Not all companies charge more for some than others. I see where one company is going to cut back three stage paint allowance to that of two stage. Another manipulation of our industry. When you can show that shops with agreements can give away paint and materials, they try to force other shops to accept those caps and thresholds because of prevailing practices of shops that continue to prostitute themselves to insurers to remain on the DRP drip or sow's teat.

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 08:13 pm Post Subject:

Well I had to come to the shop today anyway. A customer that was putting flowers on her mothers grave accidently left the keys in her car and it fell into gear and rolled down an incline. Some of us actually care about our customers and take time to help them. It's not like those bogus insurance ads where he agents go find replacement vehicles or put on scuba gear to pull their insureds belongings out of the pond. While I was here, I decided to respond for what will be the last time addressing the subjects in this and the other thread.


I have given it some thought, I have the documents scanned and have permission from the vehicle owners to share. But if you want to see them come over to my board and display some of the bravado and mistatements about the practices and antics of insurers and their DRP partners. Convince a seasoned group of shop owners and an attorney and some industry leadership that what you say is gospel.

I am weary of playing in your sandbox where you get to make up the rules and moderate. Go fetch me this Mike, prove it to me Mike, you are a liar mike. Just like Jack Nicholson said, "You can't handle the truth". Let's face it. No one is watching this thread but insurance people and some shop owners and it serves little purpose for consumers because the content information is not within the scope of their understanding.

The porn site as you call it at Pro Discussions is not on the shop owner's board. We had a difficult time keeping insurance bad boys and girls from destroying the consumer site with filth. Myself and many others donated money to a software engineer to clean up our board to keep the nefarious types out and it has filters. Some of Lori's potty mouth words would have been filtered out. So don't use that as an excuse to not educate yourself to the truth of the industry.

Come on over if you want to sling some mud and call everyone there liars as well. If you don't it will be your own admission that you can't face reality and the truth. Simply post that you would like to see a copy of the line item discount for parts to me and I will post it there, and many others will contibute.

As far as I am concerned , my participation in this thread is finished, I will take the liberty of speaking directly to consumers in the future and will not respond to the provoked abuse and attacks by the moderater and her ilk. You do not have to register or share your true identity over at ProD. I am sure your employer would not advise you of doing it either if they allow you to post at all. All we are doing here is rehashing information I have already proven to you anyway. Come on over the water's fineeeeeee!

http://www.prodiscussions.com/cgi-bin/pro_discussions.pl

I think I'll spend some time over at Edmunds.com helping people in their claims forum. Its not so heavily loaded with insurer propogandists and has a nice blend of attorneys, experts, shop owners, DV knowledgeable people, salesmen, insurers, etc.

this is too typical and a good read on what kind of a battle people face when dealing with some insurers. Found on the Edmunds site.

www.prine.net/farmers.htm

Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 06:05 am Post Subject:

this is too typical and a good read on what kind of a battle people face when dealing with some insurers. Found on the Edmunds site.

I read the emails and thought the adjuster did a great job. The poster claims to be an insurance broker... clearly not in the P&C area, not an insurance broker, or about the dumbest one I've seen. The poster cannot understand why an insurance company would not pay more for repairs then the value of the vehicle? The poster also thinks that maintenance items should increase the value of the vehicle (including a detailing job). The poster also thinks the threat of sending a bill to the Farmers insured is going to change anything. Clearly this "insurance broker" does not have a clue about insurance.

One of the problems is that poster feels a 1992 Mercedes is going to be worth a small fortune in a few years. Obviously the poster has an emotional attachment to the vehicle so he/she probably feels that it's worth much more then it is. I can understand this but it certainly makes the claim difficult to settle.

After the poster speaks to his mechanic, he/she understands that they vehicle is required to be a total loss. The claim then starts to move forward again.

Again, one of the big hurdles is that the poster thinks keeping the vehicle in good running order somehow adds to it's value. These items maintain it's value.

The poster also thinks a new full sized rental is insufficient. Poster thinks compensation for a Cadillac at $100 is correct. Sorry, this is just not even close to being correct.

Poster agrees to waive the charges for the time he/she has spent on the claim? Again... not owed.

I'm also reading and reading and reading and have yet to get to the point where the poster tells the adjuster what the vehicle is correctly worth and why. I've read where the poster comes up with an $11k figure but this is the Farmers offer plus maintenance costs... hardly a good determination of value. Also the adjuster make a good and valid point... adding the exact amount spend on maintaining the vehicle is obviously incorrect. If I replace the old worn out brakes for $500, the vehicle's value does not all of a sudden increase $500. Does _anyone_ disagree? The adjuster then gives examples of book values (not one, rather several) clearly showing the value of the vehicle to be in the range of their offer. This is a far cry from the posters made up value.

The poster then turns into an attorney and tells Farmers that leaving the his vehicle at the body shop where it's incurring storage will not be his problem, as the adjuster informs, rather Farmers will be paying for it. He could not be more incorrect. Farmers has made the offer to move it to a storage free facility. Ultimately the poster has the legal obligation to mitigate his loss. He thinks he's running up the bill against Farmers but he's really just digging a hole for himself/herself.

I read to the very end of the page and _NEVER_ found that the poster indicated a valid value of his/her vehicle. The adjuster even asked him/her to provide this information so that they could review it but the poster does not seem interested in supporting his/her claim.

I've seen this a lot before. It's a shame that the poster feels the need to be belligerent. Things could work in his/her favor is he/she would simply act like a professional. Not wanting to have a verbal conversation with the adjuster is just stupid. Writing notes back and forth does not allow for the proper sharing of ideas. The poster is just hurting himself/herself be demanding this.

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:40 am Post Subject:

The porn site as you call it at Pro Discussions is not on the shop owner's board.

The heck it isn't! It's under the ''humor'' tab! Look again MIKE....

Some of Lori's potty mouth words would have been filtered out.

I had never heard the term 'whore' used for a body shop in my life until I read it on that board....seriously....and as to my potty mouth...I got one, (not on this board) but I've got one....your favorite 'mike site' is full of cursing this site is not....well it's full of foul language when someone over there disagrees with you....as I said you all pounch and eat your own...I actually feel sorry for some of the shop owners that you can tell didn't read many threads prior to posting honest, sincere questions when BAM....attack....their gone...like sharks in a feeding frenzy..

You are so transparent..you go from ""I NEVER used that term'' to

I might have used your potty mouth term for "prostituting

You offer up documentation to post, then when called out...you respond with

Sorry not going to chase you documentation today, maybe tomorrow.

I'll scan those docs for you tomorrow or the next day when I get time

But if you want to see them come over to my board and display some of the bravado and mistatements about the practices and antics of insurers and their DRP partners.

Just more unsubstaniated bs....Why would I want to come over there and post? You 'eat' your own for not agreeing with you...I don't consider it fun to come and disrupt another's site Mike why would I? How is that my business? Just because you feel the need to troll doesn't mean everyone else does! I know they aren't going to agree with me...that's not a site for discussions at all! It's a site of statements!

I am weary of playing in your sandbox where you get to make up the rules and moderate.

You cannot name one time I have ever 'moderated' one letter you've typed...

I have a tape recording of a regional claims manager telling me that he is going to tell all my customers that I will not work from his estimates

That's a true statement right?

On the matter of paint and materials, many paint companies use an averaging system to price their paint. Not all companies charge more for some than others

Get outta here...who does that? Seriously which paint supplier does that? I'm going to check that cause I don't buy it...

I see where one company is going to cut back three stage paint allowance to that of two stage. Another manipulation of our industry

Would be correct if it were true...who? and where did you read this? I seriously doubt this one too...

Come on over if you want to sling some mud and call everyone there liars as well. If you don't it will be your own admission that you can't face reality and the truth. Simply post that you would like to see a copy of the line item discount for parts to me and I will post it there, and many others will contibute.

Again Mike, I'm not a troll...if you have this proof that you say you have, and you offered to post it here on this board that you came to then post it...I have absolutely no intention to come and cause trouble on ''your'' board...why would I? that's just stupid...and once again proves you are lying about this documentation that YOU offered up!!! and is your norm, then can't produce, because IT DOESN'T EXSIST!!!

Come on over the water's fineeeeeee!

I will NEVER...if after reading this thread someone using my name does post there, KNOW it's NOT me..have your webmaster check the computer it's coming from because I GAURANTEE YOU IT ISN'T ME...

All we are doing here is rehashing information I have already proven to you anyway

No Mike you haven't proved a thing...oh wait a minute yes you have... :roll:

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 01:27 pm Post Subject:

You wouldn't recognize proof if it hit you in the nose. Check out Matrix Paint systems. The last time they hawked that paint line to me, that was the selling point. I haven't the time or inclination to do your fetching. If you read it you would still say it was not true.

You should stay here, You wouldn't last one day on that board, The bs o meter would sniff your lack of knowledge of the collision industry and the true sentiments of your lacky shops that serve only you instead of consumers.

Save your potty mouth for the lunch room exchanges of how you and your cronies get shops to beg you for work and how easy it is to lead them on when they prostitute themselves. You should continue to be an insurance mouthpiece over here, don't bless our board with your virtures, vitriol, and Lorisms. A professed know it all as yourself could learn something from some of the most independent free thinkers in the industry over there, rather than stand on a soap box here and dish out the propoganda that your employers and handlers would have you spew about things you do not seem to have a grasp of. Continue to lambast what you call it lies since you can't disprove otherwise.

Add your comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.