I am trying to quote

Message Author
ampm-bookmark
delicious-small Add to delicious
yahoomyweb-small Add to YahooMyWeb
blinklist-small Add to BlinkList
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:03 pm   Post subject: I am trying to quote  

I am trying to quote a policy for a client who owns and lives in a duplex, but rents out the other side. What policy form do I use to write this?

Thank you.

NaomiZammit
New member
Leave a quick message



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1


1.45 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:56 pm   Post subject:   

I'm an adjuster not an agent but what about a homeowners policy (H0-2?) as he owns the home. This would cover the building, the owners personal property as well as liability. I see no difference then if the home owner had a roommate that paid rent.

tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

tcope
Forum Expert

Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 6175

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
375.37 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:54 pm   Post subject:   

Quote:
I see no difference then if the home owner had a roommate that paid rent.
It's not a room mate t, (if I understand it) it's a duplex...I think he's gonna need something that insure's that side as a dwelling only and some type of landlords liability as well. And of course and HO on his own side...


_________________

"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Lori
Forum Expert

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8080

Location: Missouri
287.93 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:43 am   Post subject:   

I'd think an HO-2 would provide dwelling coverage for the entire building even though it's divided into two living spaces as it's still one building but I could be wrong about this. I highly doubt two policies would be needed. I don't see that any special landlord liability policy is needed as an HO policy would provide this type of liability coverage anyway.

tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

tcope
Forum Expert

Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 6175

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
375.37 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:07 pm   Post subject:   

Quote:
highly doubt two policies would be needed. I don't see that any special landlord liability policy is needed as an HO policy would provide this type of liability coverage anyway.
I don't think it would have to be two policys...also (and I could be wrong it's been awhile since I handled these 'types' of claims) I think the standard HO policy excludes liablity for type of tenants, (that the insured charges or is paid a fee for their occupancy)...When I had rental property I had a 'dwelling' (or then it was a b450 I think) policy with 'landlords' liability endorcment....covered me for anything that could happen to my tenants due to my negligence...


_________________

"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Lori
Forum Expert

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8080

Location: Missouri
287.93 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:09 pm   Post subject:   

Exludes liability coverage to the insured for injuries to tenents?

tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

tcope
Forum Expert

Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 6175

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
375.37 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:14 pm   Post subject:   

Quote:
Exludes liability coverage to the insured for injuries to tenents?
I think that the standard HO (owner occupied) policy excludes any liability (that the insured would/could be held liable for) for any 'tenants'....like (for instance) how it excludes liability (or even medpay too for that matter) for a resident of the household...same type of exclusion.


_________________

"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Lori
Forum Expert

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8080

Location: Missouri
287.93 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:21 pm   Post subject:   

Agreed... but I see no reason (nor any policy) why a landlord would want to extend liability coverage _to_ a tenant. That is, the landlord would not need to cover the tenant for the tenants negligent actions. The landlord only needs to protect his/her property and have coverage for his/her own liability. Just a an apartment complex owner is not going to provide liability coverage to their renters.

tcope
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

tcope
Forum Expert

Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 6175

Location: Salt Lake City, UT
375.37 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:31 pm   Post subject:   

Quote:
That is, the landlord would not need to cover the tenant for the tenants negligent actions.
agreed..
Quote:
The landlord only needs to protect his/her property and have coverage for his/her own liability
Right, liability protection for the ins/landlord against or for anything that the insured landlord could be found negligent for regarding a tenant...like that post we had were the landlord had a bad step or something and the tenant fell and was injured...that landlord was negligent, and thus liable for the injuries to that tenant...I'll look and see if I can find that old policy/endorcement...Most (or all) standard HO policys exclude liability coverage (meaning collecting under that coverage) for a resident of the household/building right? The tenant is an occupant or resident of the building...so unless there is something other than the standard HO policy, I think there might be an issue...I just know that I had this endorcement on my rental, (actually I think it was required when it's a non-owner occupied dwelling here or with the company I was insured with one or the other)....and handled several claims (again YEARS ago)...with tenants falling etc....course they had this landlords liability coverage...am I making any sense at all? If you had a standard HO policy, and the 'tenant' tripped and fell would there be ANY coverage? medpay or liability? see I think it's excluded, as a resident and also as a tenant...what do you think?


_________________

"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr.
Lori
Forum Expert
Leave a quick message

Lori
Forum Expert

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8080

Location: Missouri
287.93 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:51 am   Post subject:   

HO for the side she lives in. Landlord for the tenant's side.



_________________

Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. - Ferris Bueller
LifeIsGood
Senior member
Leave a quick message

LifeIsGood

Joined: 22 Sep 2008
Posts: 574


1.31 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:14 pm   Post subject:   

I would think a HO policy will cover the whole building. Just make sure that if it is two addresses that both are recorded and the Building RC is for the whole building - not just one unit.



And it is always good advice for a landlord to insist that tenant's have a tenant's insurance policy. That covers the tenants contents and legal liability.



_________________

I am an insurance broker from Ontario licensed for all types of insurance.



Please visit my site: www.canada-insurance-source.com
OntarioBroker
Preferred member
Leave a quick message



Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 107

Location: Ontario, Canada
34.86 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:18 pm   Post subject:   

Technically, the best way to do it would to rate the home as a "multi-family" home. At least, we have that option - and would probably do it that way. The tenants personal belongings would not be covered as they are not listed on the poicy. They would still have to get a renter's policy.



_________________

Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. - Ferris Bueller
LifeIsGood
Senior member
Leave a quick message

LifeIsGood

Joined: 22 Sep 2008
Posts: 574


1.31 Dollars($)

Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1


Get a Quote
Ask Community Experts

flash plugin

Quick Links

Must See

Community

Hot topics in forums

Latest in blogs

    Connection Error: Connection refused