How good is Safeco for independent agents?

by Guest » Tue Mar 04, 2008 02:39 pm
Guest

Does anyone have any experience working with Safeco? What were the pros and cons? I'd love to hear your thoughts. I'm most interested in how they treat their independent agents, but I'd appreciate anything you can add.

Thanks!
Leonard

Total Comments: 77

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:15 pm Post Subject:

But I stand by the premise as it falls under negotiating tactics or skills

.
THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU SAID!!!!!! YOU SAID , (and I quote...duh)

Adjusters are often rewarded for getting you to accept less than you feel the claim is worth.



HOW EXACTLY are these Adjusters '''rewarded''' (monetarily is of course the inference, what else could it be?)...for '''getting''' some poor ins/clmt to accept less that their claim is worth? HOW HOW HOW...AND WHO? That is illegal Mike, and I'm just appauled that you have it in you to make a comment like that!!! And think we are due an explaination....who is rewarded? and for what? how do you measure that? This is truly reaching the bottom of the barrell to make a comment like that!

I have spoken to many appraisers for multiple companies that infom me that they routinely recieve bonuses for getting shops not to submit supplements and for getting settlements based on their estimates even if they are incomplete.

I'm sorry Mike, but that is an out and out bald faced lie! PERIOD.......Name three companies who's adjusters have told you this, and I will personally contact them myself and ask them myself!!!! who know's maybe I work for one of them!!!....Further more I cannot believe an adjuster would even say such a thing!!!!

I also have somewhere in my possession copies of pages in insurance training manuals of many insurance company estimating guidelines

POST 'EM THEN!!!!! Because I don't believe they exist (in the manner you are saying)......

never speak to a claimant when they call

WHAT? That's crazy... How you gonna' settle the claim then?

Other tactics are sending a check to an obstinate vehicle owner or claimant with an artificial deadline imposed. Never happens

Deadline for what? Closing the claim? There is a deadline Mike, it's called a 'statute of limitations'

I don't know which company you work, for but judging by your responses, you obviously do not operate like this but their are slugs that do.

It wouldn't matter which company I work for but it is one on your ''hate'' list....I know there are slugs out there, but I can tell you there ain't one that pays bonus' for screwing over ANYONE!!! and am certain you can't prove it..you could though prove (or I could) shop's offering kick-backs and payola to adjusters to get cars to them!!!!!!!!

You also have to know that there are disgruntled insurance employees that share these documents and training guides with people not in the insurance business. I personally have seen many of these documents and guides and have had them in my possession at times.

Of course there are, I'm disgruntled myself at times...and frankly wouldn't have any trouble showing any training material, because it is nothing like you are trying to lead people to believe at all!!!!!! As a matter of fact I just had to 'endure' eight hours of customer service training! Not a word about claims costs, nothing all about making the customer happy...now don't that just sound like an industry that is handing out bonuses for jippin' folks!!!!!!!

I have generally always been able to help total loss customers acquire addtional funds on claims that they would not have without my assistance, sometimes for as much as 15 percent more. Now if that claims person had not been called on their failure to offer a fair settlement without me showing the vehicle owner where they may be owed additional sums, then one might come to the conclusion that it could be intentional.

That's great Mike, I've corrected adjusters myself when they have overlooked something or an owner says, 'hey wait a minute'...I assure you it has never been intentional on the adjusters part that I have had contact with ...That isn't my point and you know it....I'm upset and frankly angry and very very disappointed in you stating adjusters are 'rewarded' for screwing people over...that is a lie plan and simple.....

We can't even take so much as an ink pen from a shop now...used to get all kinds of jugs of booze, flowers, food, ball tickets etc...(in the good old days) from shops and suppliers (never ever affected the way I handled a claim, however can't say the same is true of all adjusters)....but that was the body shops attempting to buy or 'reward' the adjuster, not a company doing that for blatently under cutting a claim's value....Integrity is so high on the list in this industry now, that I can actually be fired for accepting a piece of pizza from a shop unless it's out in the main lobby for anyone that walks in the door to have !!! Now you think an industry that is so freakin' paranoid about integrity would actually give their adjusters a 'reward' or bonus for shorting a claim? This is by far the most obnoxious, out of line, mean, cruel, uninformed, vicious, bottom of the barrell made up thing you have said so far....

I wrote that before I became so darned cute I suppose

damn skippy.......

I ASK YOU FOR THE LAST TIME.....PROVE, THE STATEMENT YOU MADE,

Adjusters are often rewarded for getting you to accept less than you feel the claim is worth.

, OR KINDLY RETRACT IT......

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:26 pm Post Subject:

But I stand by the premise

Now it's a ''premise'' you have stated it as FACT !!!!!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 03:05 am Post Subject: Sorry for the bee I put in your Easter Bonnet

It wouldn't matter which company I work for but it is one on your ''hate'' list....I know there are slugs out there, but I can tell you there ain't one that pays bonus' for screwing over ANYONE!!! and am certain you can't prove it..you could though prove (or I could) shop's offering kick-backs and payola to adjusters to get cars to them!!!!!!!!

Hate is such a dirty word let's just say some companies I dispise their steering and claims handling practices.

In Illinois Mr Groebner pocketed some pretty hefty personal income for leaning on at least three shops for payola to keep them on the preferred shop programs. Let's just say they are all dirty. The crime he was busted for was income tax evasion. He has to pay the money back and stay in his room til he learns to play nice.

In the gulf, at least one company had a policy of shopping around for engineering reports that would come to a conclusion the insurer favored so claims could be denied. Two women that were subcontractors for the company took those documents and blew the whistle.

Oklahoma tornadoes a couple years back, same insurance company and the same engineering firm. Coincidence?

Northridge fires in California,,,

When pigs fly in Colorado,,,,

Put on the boxing gloves when claimants get demanding was pretty heavily documented.

Yellow sheeting,,, a term used to describe how one insurer had paper work in yellow to designate a code that this was a claim that could be bullied or denied.

Let's recently there was Gil Palmer and autoclub of California

Gil Palmer, a senior manager of Auto Club of Southern California and the principal in charge of their IRP, direct referral program was terminated following an investigation that could reach dozens or more shops in Southern California. Potentially implicated in the ongoing investigation are numerous shop owners, some with high profiles and numerous locations that dominate the southern California marketplace. Rumors allege that Palmer took payoffs in the form of consulting agreements through a sideline business he created. The rumors also suggest he received gifts in the form of cash, paint jobs on hot rod cars (you might see it on-line!), leather jackets, Rolex watches, lavish vacation accommodations, and much more. While official sources at Auto Club remain silent, the investigation continues today. Charges and lawsuits are pending and are expected to be filed within days and weeks.


These were all cases or incidences of management using tactics to under pay or deny claims or to collect payola. It does exist today, and you can deny if you like.

Sounds like things are a little muddy everywhere. It may not be as bad as it was at the shop level when appraisers were recipients of fishing trips, free work, help with roofing their house, etc such as it was back in the 70's and 80's, but I am sure there are still pockets of this activity going on.

I would call a reward getting to keep your job or getting promoted for using tactics which may contribute to settlements being taken for less than their value. A reward could even result in a merit pay.

Are there companies that grade their appraiser on performance
Am I a bald face liar, I think not. I stand by my comments.

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 03:49 am Post Subject: Key performance indicators

Lori and Mr. of the Ozarks, my brother is an adjuster for Allstate. His anual pay raise is directly affected by the percentages of alternate parts written. There is more but I don't want to steal your thread. Go to job vent.com, read the progressive stories.

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:16 am Post Subject:

Mike you still did not prove your point.....You posted quips about dirty adjusters and shops...not about company's 'rewarding' or giving 'bonuses' to adjusters for under valueing claims! Which is what you said they did....

This is reaching...

I would call a reward getting to keep your job

Are you freakin' kiddin' me? In that case, Mike you are 'rewarded' for OVER CHARGING people for the work you do on their cars....

A reward could even result in a merit pay

Oh brother!!!!!!!

Are there companies that grade their appraiser on performance

Well of course how do your rate your employee? That's just dumb...EVERYONE is rated on preformance...AGAIN, you showed not one single thing to prove that....

Adjusters are often rewarded for getting you to accept less than you feel the claim is worth

Kind of a theme with you huh Mike? Once again, you've made outlandish statements without ANY facts to back them up..... :roll: You should be ashamed....You tout that all you want to do is educate the consumer, when in fact you do the polar opposite.....spousing opinion, and made up statements as fact!

Man, was I wrong, I thought you were a man of character and integrity...I'm done.

Iknownothing, you are correct some carriers have measures such as alternative parts percentages as part of their yearly goals...In fact a company I worked for from 86-96 did....now the company I work for now and have for seven years has never had that in the yearly goals...as a matter of fact I just got my new ones for 08 and over fifty percent of it relates to customer satisfaction.....

Go to job vent.com, read the progressive stories.

Been there and read them....course it's not a site set up to tell good stories about any employer... :roll:

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 03:24 pm Post Subject: It is all about greed

Greed breeds mistrust, malfeasance, corruption, collusion, conspiracy to commit fraud with partners in the collision side. Drp relationships are nothing more than veiled agreements designed to repair vehicles cheap and fast, both of which deny policy holders and claimants of what is due them. This example is another where the insurer settles claims paying based on what they feel they owe rather than using the guides accurately.

All of the cases I presented were examples of greed either by the company, their appraisers or adjusters and regional claims managers to commit fraud to keep money in the insurance coffers or their collective pockets. Of course, it takes a weak shop owner to help and abet the corrupt insurance employee. Takes two to tangle. Is there corruption in the collision side of the equation? You bet! As soon as the insurance industry continues to thin the herd of providers and those shops that did not learn to market themselves and learn who the customer really is, then maybe some of those shops will cease to exist as well.

I have never overcharged for repairs; If anything, I and others are underpaid by companies like yours that come up with notions of blend within all designed to keep more money in the insurance hands and out of the consumers. Just today, I am completing a job where the insurer overpaid by 1200 dollars on one of their insured's vehicles. Will I keep the money, hardly! Because of their ineptness or inability to hire an appraiser than can actually write an accurate estimate, they were giving money away. My invoice will be for only those repairs and procedures we peform and agree to with the vehicle owner and the overpayment goes back to the vehicle owner to return to their provider since I am not party to the contract of insurance, but I am contracted with the vehicle owner.

This whole thread kind of reminds me of one regressive adjuster I encountered a few years ago. When I wouldn't bend over and grab my ankles for him to abuse me or my customer, He barked I ain't got time to F&#K with you. I wonder what negotiating or training class he learned that in. He was shown the exit and told to get in his little white vehicle and go back to the mother ship and do not ever darken this shop's doorway again. And to think I almost got a clean break from the forum without being a bald faced liar, a thief, a man with no integrity. Oh well.

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 03:34 pm Post Subject: I forgot to add this, someone emailed this example to me

Robert Dietz was a senior claims adjuster for Farmers Insurance Exchange from 1987 until 2001. He currently is a claims practices expert and testifies nationally on insurance issues and bad faith.
Statement: “I used to be an Insurance Claims Supervisor. When I started out, it was human beings making decisions. Now insurance companies use computer programs to automatically cut 20 percent from what they know they owe on a claim.”
In the mid-1990s, consulting companies introduced software programs that turned claims operations into “profit centers” by routinely underpaying


A KING-5 investigation into insurance business strategies found that insurance companies have adopted strategies designed by business consultants to reduce claim payouts based on profit motives, not on what was owed for the claim. The consultants urged “more aggressive tactics when settling claims to send a message to lawyers and the public” and that “paying "promptly and fairly" does not reward Allstate shareholders with profits.” KING-5 found that Allstate and State Farm are former McKinsey clients.iv claims. The programs helped adjusters place values on insurance claims.



If you want to read the entire article here is a link.

Maybe you could call Mr Deitz and see if he got his bonus.

http://www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com/pdf/farmers_insurance_rob_dietz.pdf

Link deactivated - Evan

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 03:41 pm Post Subject: On the subject of bonuses

Statement: “I was forced to use it. You even got bonuses for denying claims.”
According to memos from Farmers, Dietz and his colleagues' salaries and bonuses were tied to practices that encouraged the delay, denial, underpayment and forced litigation of claims. One document encouraged adjusters to settle small claims below their value, adding adjusters should learn “…to say “sorry, no more,” with a toothy grin and mean it.”iii

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 07:21 pm Post Subject:

Nice site Mike read the fine print by chance?

All content and information on this site is my opinion or the opinion of those referenced. This site is for educational purposes. The information in the Forums or from other people, blogs or web sites are provided at face value, we have not confirmed any of these stories/opinions



Once again the ONLY links you provide are from gripe sites, (this particular owner even calls his a gripe site)...now he (the site owner) may have a legitiment complaint, and certainly a passion...I have never said there aren't some bad things that happen on the carrier side and certainly should be delt with harshly....

But the fact of the matter is you are STILL not proving this statement or any others you have made!!!! Why can you not see that?

The ONE count them ONE, not ''often'' or

Adjusters are often rewarded

and that isn't even backed up with any data, and vague at best!

I almost got a clean break from the forum without being a bald faced liar, a thief, a man with no integrity. Oh well.

Actually I said the statement was a bald face lie, and you have yet to prove that isn't correct...don't remember calling you a thief, other than to ask how you too would like the broad generalization that all in your craft are theives..as you insist on labeling all adjusters/carriers, oh, you throw out a, 'not all' once in a while then make comments like you did in this thread, then wander all over the place, like talking about an adjuster you had an argument with a few years ago (what did that have to do with anything?) never ever proving your statements, or atleast admitting they are nothing more than over exaggeration, based on hearsay, and personal opinion.....no integrity, well lets see the definition of integrity.........nope, I'm not gonna' do it, spent 15 minutes typing it and erased, it, not gonna sink to that level....I think your posts speak for themselves..

Add your comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.