Election security Q gall stones? bot farms and why do hackers target elections
Why don't we just go back to paper ballots? At least they are unable to be hacked.
Patterson:This was a very common query. And it seems like a common theme about the same series was: research, If it can be hacked it must be hacked at some point, as well as election machines and election computers.
Through the course of our reporting, We many userful stuff here about how not just voting computers work, But this process. Why do cyberpunks target elections?Patterson:thereby, The motives of hacking an election are kind of as broad as the number of weaknesses that exist and the types of hackers, And we did cover this in previous episodes. accordingly, Hackers attack elections for a couple specific reasons. One is obviously political. vehicle a nation state, A lone wolf or a hactivist, Or you are a private venture, a good oligarch, Or a profitable business like Cambridge Analytica, The goals kinds of differ. For indonesia, russia, Saudi arabic, The goals are obviously political. For a hacktivist group or organization, Those goals can be political as well, But additional nuanced. So may perhaps be: when you've got more followers, Or it seems to resemble you have more followers, You're more influential and carry more weight. due to the fact 2016, We've heard of the various influence campaigns and have this new sort of dictionary of words that we never knew anything about before. You've remarked about hacktivists and bot farms. Go over again what they are?Patterson: So it can ties into the IRA and the GRU. We did see this in Saudi arabia. What Russia did is hire almost like a business enterprise. [In Saudi arabic] ended up employees, They went to an office, They made sure in, They had systems staff. They had people who were coding algorithms.. these folks were paid almost $3,000 as website visitors to create fake and spam accounts, And once one got banned or blocked they would start another. Some people wonder if whoever loses the election is able to blame hacking. If Republicans dump, they must say hacking. If dems lose, they may say hacking. What's your reaction to that?Patterson: making this, anymore, A quite normal refrain, And it's quite important that we address this, Because hacking and election safeguard is a non partisan issue. We spoke to dozens of individuals on both sides of the aisle who are experts and they ukraine chat want us to all understand that our democratic process is significant. It's critical that we go and vote and feel a sense of trust and security. Hackers can target designated systems, But they are not necessarily taking one particular side. They may take a side in someone elections and all of the actors that we have discussed may have their own agendas. Why don't we just get back on paper ballots? At least they are unable to be hacked.
Patterson: This was a very common query. And it seems like a common theme all over the country series was: examine, If it can be hacked it probably will be hacked at some point, including election machines and election computers.
Through the course of our reporting, We many userful stuff here about how not just voting computers work, But the total process. And as we move into this digital age of connected devices we call it the IoT, The Internet of Things large numbers of election systems probably are and will be connected in the future, consequently it probably is a good idea to have a paper backup or an audit trail something that is a hard, Non digital delivery of your voting record.
queen. Why do criminals target elections?
Patterson: quite, The motives of hacking an election are kind of as broad as the number of weaknesses that exist and the types of hackers, And we did cover this in previous episodes. which means, Hackers attack elections for a number of specific reasons. One is actually political. an additional a nation state, A lone hair or a hactivist, Or you are a private agency, another oligarch, Or a business like Cambridge Analytica, The goals amount of differ.
For india, paris, Saudi arabic, The goals must be political. For a hacktivist group or lending broker, Those goals can be political as well, But much more nuanced. And who could kind of vary, folks Anonymous or New World Hackers or a different group, Those goals kind of depend on what they want at that particular moment.
With private companies, It's really easy for us to kind of look the IRA [Russia's Internet reports Agency] or GRU [Russian military data agency] as Cambridge Analytica, But there are also companies like Devumi here in america that sold fake followers, circumstances tie into what we call social proof. So may possibly be: if you feel led more followers, Or it seems as you have more followers, You're more influential and carry excess fat. indeed, That ties into influence campaigns and the use of social media to not really hack one particular vulnerability, But to kind of do what we call cognitive hacking, explaining hacking our minds.
queen. provided 2016, We've found out about the various influence campaigns and have this new sort of dictionary of words that we never knew anything about before. You've remarked hacktivists and bot farms. Go over again what they are?
Patterson: So this again ties into the IRA and the GRU. We did see this in Saudi arabia. What Russia did is hire almost like a corporation. [In Saudi arabic] there were employees, They went to a business office, They reviewed in, They had systems administrators. They had people who were coding algorithms.. they were paid almost $3,000 as individuals to create fake and spam accounts, And once one got banned or blocked they would start someone else. Some of these companies and individuals create algorithms that will kind of do this at mass scale.
A bot farm is kind of colloquial language that refers to the organized effort to create spam accounts on social media.
queen. Some people wonder if whoever loses the election will most likely blame hacking. If Republicans lessen, they will say hacking. If dems lose, they're say hacking. What's your a reaction to that?
Patterson: making this, when again, A quite typical refrain, And it's fundamental that we address this, Because hacking and election equity is a non partisan issue. We spoke to dozens of individuals on both sides of the aisle who are experts and they want us to all understand that our democratic process is important. It's critical that we go and vote and feel a sense of trust and security.
Hackers can target explicit systems, But they are definitely not taking one particular side. They may take a side in man or women elections and all of the actors that we have discussed may have their own agendas. But hacking is a non partisan issue, And if we get mired into a mud sling on the left or suitable, Or any designated issue, It's a diversion from genuine issue.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 11:21 am Post Subject:
Election security Q gall stones? bot farms and why do hackers target elections
Why don't we just go back to paper ballots? At least they are unable to be hacked.
Patterson:This was a very common query. And it seems like a common theme about the same series was: research, If it can be hacked it must be hacked at some point, as well as election machines and election computers.
Through the course of our reporting, We many userful stuff here about how not just voting computers work, But this process. Why do cyberpunks target elections?Patterson:thereby, The motives of hacking an election are kind of as broad as the number of weaknesses that exist and the types of hackers, And we did cover this in previous episodes. accordingly, Hackers attack elections for a couple specific reasons. One is obviously political. vehicle a nation state, A lone wolf or a hactivist, Or you are a private venture, a good oligarch, Or a profitable business like Cambridge Analytica, The goals kinds of differ. For indonesia, russia, Saudi arabic, The goals are obviously political. For a hacktivist group or organization, Those goals can be political as well, But additional nuanced. So may perhaps be: when you've got more followers, Or it seems to resemble you have more followers, You're more influential and carry more weight. due to the fact 2016, We've heard of the various influence campaigns and have this new sort of dictionary of words that we never knew anything about before. You've remarked about hacktivists and bot farms. Go over again what they are?Patterson: So it can ties into the IRA and the GRU. We did see this in Saudi arabia. What Russia did is hire almost like a business enterprise. [In Saudi arabic] ended up employees, They went to an office, They made sure in, They had systems staff. They had people who were coding algorithms.. these folks were paid almost $3,000 as website visitors to create fake and spam accounts, And once one got banned or blocked they would start another. Some people wonder if whoever loses the election is able to blame hacking. If Republicans dump, they must say hacking. If dems lose, they may say hacking. What's your reaction to that?Patterson: making this, anymore, A quite normal refrain, And it's quite important that we address this, Because hacking and election safeguard is a non partisan issue. We spoke to dozens of individuals on both sides of the aisle who are experts and they ukraine chat want us to all understand that our democratic process is significant. It's critical that we go and vote and feel a sense of trust and security. Hackers can target designated systems, But they are not necessarily taking one particular side. They may take a side in someone elections and all of the actors that we have discussed may have their own agendas. Why don't we just get back on paper ballots? At least they are unable to be hacked.
Patterson: This was a very common query. And it seems like a common theme all over the country series was: examine, If it can be hacked it probably will be hacked at some point, including election machines and election computers.
Through the course of our reporting, We many userful stuff here about how not just voting computers work, But the total process. And as we move into this digital age of connected devices we call it the IoT, The Internet of Things large numbers of election systems probably are and will be connected in the future, consequently it probably is a good idea to have a paper backup or an audit trail something that is a hard, Non digital delivery of your voting record.
queen. Why do criminals target elections?
Patterson: quite, The motives of hacking an election are kind of as broad as the number of weaknesses that exist and the types of hackers, And we did cover this in previous episodes. which means, Hackers attack elections for a number of specific reasons. One is actually political. an additional a nation state, A lone hair or a hactivist, Or you are a private agency, another oligarch, Or a business like Cambridge Analytica, The goals amount of differ.
For india, paris, Saudi arabic, The goals must be political. For a hacktivist group or lending broker, Those goals can be political as well, But much more nuanced. And who could kind of vary, folks Anonymous or New World Hackers or a different group, Those goals kind of depend on what they want at that particular moment.
With private companies, It's really easy for us to kind of look the IRA [Russia's Internet reports Agency] or GRU [Russian military data agency] as Cambridge Analytica, But there are also companies like Devumi here in america that sold fake followers, circumstances tie into what we call social proof. So may possibly be: if you feel led more followers, Or it seems as you have more followers, You're more influential and carry excess fat. indeed, That ties into influence campaigns and the use of social media to not really hack one particular vulnerability, But to kind of do what we call cognitive hacking, explaining hacking our minds.
queen. provided 2016, We've found out about the various influence campaigns and have this new sort of dictionary of words that we never knew anything about before. You've remarked hacktivists and bot farms. Go over again what they are?
Patterson: So this again ties into the IRA and the GRU. We did see this in Saudi arabia. What Russia did is hire almost like a corporation. [In Saudi arabic] there were employees, They went to a business office, They reviewed in, They had systems administrators. They had people who were coding algorithms.. they were paid almost $3,000 as individuals to create fake and spam accounts, And once one got banned or blocked they would start someone else. Some of these companies and individuals create algorithms that will kind of do this at mass scale.
A bot farm is kind of colloquial language that refers to the organized effort to create spam accounts on social media.
queen. Some people wonder if whoever loses the election will most likely blame hacking. If Republicans lessen, they will say hacking. If dems lose, they're say hacking. What's your a reaction to that?
Patterson: making this, when again, A quite typical refrain, And it's fundamental that we address this, Because hacking and election equity is a non partisan issue. We spoke to dozens of individuals on both sides of the aisle who are experts and they want us to all understand that our democratic process is important. It's critical that we go and vote and feel a sense of trust and security.
Hackers can target explicit systems, But they are definitely not taking one particular side. They may take a side in man or women elections and all of the actors that we have discussed may have their own agendas. But hacking is a non partisan issue, And if we get mired into a mud sling on the left or suitable, Or any designated issue, It's a diversion from genuine issue.
Add your comment