by plb » Sun Dec 06, 2009 02:31 am
My insurance company judged me at fault in an auto accident on the statement of one witness who also was involved in the accident. The witnesses' statement has a sizable discrepancy in it that I feel they ignored. I thought the discrepancy was pretty obvious but my adjuster seemed surprised when I pointed it out to her . I believe the case would have been resolved in my favor had they done an accident reconstruction and examined the physical evidence. I've asked for a review to address this but how can I be sure they really do the reconstruction and don't just rubber stamp their previous conclusion?
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:19 am Post Subject: Accident
I wish. There are no cameras at this intersection,
Thanks, take care
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:22 pm Post Subject: Hit from behind in a parking garage
I was hit from behind in a parking garage after I had backed out and was preparing to move forward. They say it is my fault that I was hit. The lady lied and named a different place of where the accident happened, a different date . She was speeding and on her cell phone. Speed limit was 15 mph. Just a few scratches on my car but she claims the big dent in her fender is her damage. Does not look like it came from this accident. I think it was staged and my insurance co. is letting her get away with it. Help!!!!
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:21 pm Post Subject:
If you were backing out, and got her fender, they you are at fault. If you were all the way out and going forward, you wouldn't have hit her fender..she would've hit you square in the rear.
Your carrier should be measuring damage etc., if there is a discreptancy. As too the amount of damage, depending on the vehicles involved but a bumper to a fender, can just crush, or collaspe a fender, depending on where it hits the fender, there is nothing behind it.. There is plenty behind the bumper
Add your comment