| Message |
Author |
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:21 am Post subject: Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Coverage |
|
|
hi all!
Is there any way that I may protect myself from uninsured drivers ? Is there any UM coverage for any damages done to my vehicle? Stella McCartney. _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
Stella McCartney
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 5:09 am Post subject: This is a vital one! |
|
|
hi!
Surely. An UM/UIM policy might just safeguard you from the uninsured drivers. Some states hold on to it as mandatory for drivers. This one proves really vital towards paying for your medical bills and associated expenses once you get struck by an UM. Regards, Sasha T. |
|
sasha
Senior member
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 211
41.98 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey! It could just save you your collision coverage towards fixing your car under such circumstances when you might have just got it crashed! Got it ? Welcome, truemanapply _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
truemanapply
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:33 am Post subject: UM Property Damage Coverage might help! |
|
|
Hi yeah, its quite right in saying that the UM coverage won't only do in the event of a car mishap. It only protects for the bodily injuries except that the UM Property Damage Coverage might help you for some cases. While the collision coverage pays for your repair bills you'll be responsible for the deductible. But the UM property damage coverage is present at 26 states and the dist. of Columbia and could really turn out to be a big relief under such mishaps.
Regards, Fatman |
|
fatman
Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 578
104.45 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:32 am Post subject: know your deductibles! |
|
|
Buddy, please do remember that the deductibles for UM property-damage coverage varies from zero to $300 according to the circumstances, the coverage opted and the bond with the insurer. So know your case thoroughly in order to save your breathe. TxttorneyMoody _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
TxttorneyMoody
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:11 pm Post subject: passenger in car |
|
|
My 16 year old daughter was recently killed in a car accident. She was riding with her boyfriend in his car at the time of the accident. She was listed as a licensed driver on our policies at the time of the accident. We had 5 vehicles insured at the time with our insurance company. It is my understanding that Kentucky does allow policies to be "stacked". The limits on each of our vehicles was $250,000/$500,000. Does that mean we should be collecting $1,250,000 from our insurance company? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
katman0703
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
katman, first off, I'm so very sorry, I cannot imagine, the scope of your grief. Also sorry no one caught this thread till now.
We need to know a couple of things first...this coverage you're talking about I assume you mean your UM/UIM coverage(s)? Your BI coverages wouldn't apply and UM/UIM would be the only ones to (maybe) apply. That's only if an un-or-under insured person is at fault for the accident.
She was a passenger, but who or what was at fault for the accident? The boy friend? If he's at fault his coverage will be the one that pays, if his coverage (BI) is not high enough then your UIM will kick in. If he was uninsured your UM will, or if another non-insured party caused this accident.
Again, we need to know what caused the accident to be of assistance to you..
Your family is in my prayers _________________ "Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Martin Luther King Jr. |
|
Lori
Moderator
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 8173
Location: Missouri
287.90 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As Lori said, our hearts go out to you in this time of grieving.
But auto insurance is not a substitute for life insurance. Your ability to collect damages from an auto policy will be capped by the liability limit(s) of the "at-fault" party (and "umbrella" liability coverage, if any), plus any additional damages, such as for wrongful death, awarded as the result of a civil suit (harder to collect). _________________ California-licensed Property & Casualty Broker-Agent and Life & Health Agent. CA Insurance License #0596197. Send me your questions, and I'll send you my answers. I live, breathe, and teach insurance! |
|
MaxHerr
Moderator
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 4218
Location: Pomona CA
162.55 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 3:32 am Post subject: amazing post |
|
|
Valuable info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, I bookmarked it. _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
college loans
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: uninsured motorist, |
|
|
You stated "However, this uninsured motorist property damage does not provide coverage in a hit-and-run case." Are you referring to property damage as in what they did to say my vehicle when they hit me? or other property damage as in belonging to someone else not involved in the accident? For example, a woman was approaching a stop sign at the bottom of the hill. This other vehicle that had been parked at the curb, didnt even look when they gunned their car and swung into traffic hitting her on the passenger side of her car and causing her wheel to collapse turned inward at the bottom underneath the car. They didnt even stop but took off. She was unable to get the license number, but a passerby screamed out the number from their car.
Her vehicle was towed. The insurance company tried to tell her she was not covered under the underinsured or uninsured clause she paid to have on her policy. Being a hit and run, I went with her several days later to find out where her car had been taken. we went to the yard where it was supposed to be and found out her insurance agent had her car removed from the tow yard, and they SOLD it to a place called coparts. We called the insurance company who insisted she didnt have uninsured motorist coverage, and then told her she signed a paper to allow them to take her car out of tow and move or transfer it. They paid her nothing on her car, denied her coverage and then sold her car without even notifying her. With that they got rid of the evidence she needed to prove what car had hit her, because she found the car that did hit her, but now didnt even have access to her own car to compare the injuries to each vehicle.
DOES, the laws of the state of California Insurance laws, show that hit and run damages to your vehicle, is covered with the uninsured insurance clause?
AND, how would the insurance company have the right to take her vehicle and SELL it without notification or payment to her? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
matcee
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: uninsured motorist, |
|
|
You stated "However, this uninsured motorist property damage does not provide coverage in a hit-and-run case." Are you referring to property damage as in what they did to say my vehicle when they hit me? or other property damage as in belonging to someone else not involved in the accident? For example, a woman was approaching a stop sign at the bottom of the hill. This other vehicle that had been parked at the curb, didnt even look when they gunned their car and swung into traffic hitting her on the passenger side of her car and causing her wheel to collapse turned inward at the bottom underneath the car. They didnt even stop but took off. She was unable to get the license number, but a passerby screamed out the number from their car.
Her vehicle was towed. The insurance company tried to tell her she was not covered under the underinsured or uninsured clause she paid to have on her policy. Being a hit and run, I went with her several days later to find out where her car had been taken. we went to the yard where it was supposed to be and found out her insurance agent had her car removed from the tow yard, and they SOLD it to a place called coparts. We called the insurance company who insisted she didnt have uninsured motorist coverage, and then told her she signed a paper to allow them to take her car out of tow and move or transfer it. They paid her nothing on her car, denied her coverage and then sold her car without even notifying her. With that they got rid of the evidence she needed to prove what car had hit her, because she found the car that did hit her, but now didnt even have access to her own car to compare the injuries to each vehicle.
DOES, the laws of the state of California Insurance laws, show that hit and run damages to your vehicle, is covered with the uninsured insurance clause?
AND, how would the insurance company have the right to take her vehicle and SELL it without notification or payment to her? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
matcee
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: uninsured motorist, |
|
|
You stated "However, this uninsured motorist property damage does not provide coverage in a hit-and-run case." Are you referring to property damage as in what they did to say my vehicle when they hit me? or other property damage as in belonging to someone else not involved in the accident? For example, a woman was approaching a stop sign at the bottom of the hill. This other vehicle that had been parked at the curb, didnt even look when they gunned their car and swung into traffic hitting her on the passenger side of her car and causing her wheel to collapse turned inward at the bottom underneath the car. They didnt even stop but took off. She was unable to get the license number, but a passerby screamed out the number from their car.
Her vehicle was towed. The insurance company tried to tell her she was not covered under the underinsured or uninsured clause she paid to have on her policy. Being a hit and run, I went with her several days later to find out where her car had been taken. we went to the yard where it was supposed to be and found out her insurance agent had her car removed from the tow yard, and they SOLD it to a place called coparts. We called the insurance company who insisted she didnt have uninsured motorist coverage, and then told her she signed a paper to allow them to take her car out of tow and move or transfer it. They paid her nothing on her car, denied her coverage and then sold her car without even notifying her. With that they got rid of the evidence she needed to prove what car had hit her, because she found the car that did hit her, but now didnt even have access to her own car to compare the injuries to each vehicle.
DOES, the laws of the state of California Insurance laws, show that hit and run damages to your vehicle, is covered with the uninsured insurance clause?
AND, how would the insurance company have the right to take her vehicle and SELL it without notification or payment to her? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
matcee
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: uninsured motorist, |
|
|
You stated "However, this uninsured motorist property damage does not provide coverage in a hit-and-run case." Are you referring to property damage as in what they did to say my vehicle when they hit me? or other property damage as in belonging to someone else not involved in the accident? For example, a woman was approaching a stop sign at the bottom of the hill. This other vehicle that had been parked at the curb, didnt even look when they gunned their car and swung into traffic hitting her on the passenger side of her car and causing her wheel to collapse turned inward at the bottom underneath the car. They didnt even stop but took off. She was unable to get the license number, but a passerby screamed out the number from their car.
Her vehicle was towed. The insurance company tried to tell her she was not covered under the underinsured or uninsured clause she paid to have on her policy. Being a hit and run, I went with her several days later to find out where her car had been taken. we went to the yard where it was supposed to be and found out her insurance agent had her car removed from the tow yard, and they SOLD it to a place called coparts. We called the insurance company who insisted she didnt have uninsured motorist coverage, and then told her she signed a paper to allow them to take her car out of tow and move or transfer it. They paid her nothing on her car, denied her coverage and then sold her car without even notifying her. With that they got rid of the evidence she needed to prove what car had hit her, because she found the car that did hit her, but now didnt even have access to her own car to compare the injuries to each vehicle.
DOES, the laws of the state of California Insurance laws, show that hit and run damages to your vehicle, is covered with the uninsured insurance clause?
AND, how would the insurance company have the right to take her vehicle and SELL it without notification or payment to her? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
matcee
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | You stated "However, this uninsured motorist property damage does not provide coverage in a hit-and-run case." |
States vary in their discussion of hit and run and uninsured motorist, but in California a "hit and run" driver is always considered to be uninsured. However, uninsured motorist will not cover hit and run if the insured vehicle is used as a "residence" (such as an RV currently parked for that purpose, not simply because it's an RV).
There are several other problems in your post that need to be cleared up.
| Quote: | | found out her insurance agent had her car removed from the tow yard |
Highly unlikely that an agent is involved in a claim. And even more unlikely is that the "agent" had her car removed from the tow yard.
| Quote: | | The insurance company tried to tell her she was not covered under the underinsured or uninsured clause she paid to have on her policy |
The policy declaration page will clear up any confusion over that issue. She either has UM coverage or she does not. But there are two types of Uninsured Motorist coverage -- Physical Damage and Bodily Injury. It's very possible that she has UMBI and not UMPD -- not a common situation, but not unheard of. If a person does not have collision coverage, UMPD is limited to $3500, and if a person does have collision coverage, UMPD coverage functions as a "waiver of deductible" instead. You cannot have both the $3500 AND the waiver of deductible. UMBI, obviously, does not pay for physical damage to the vehicle, only for medical/monetary damage claims of injured persons.
So without knowing what her declarations tell us, I would suspect that she misunderstands her coverage, and if the insurance company is not paying for physical damage to her vehicle, it probably means she doesn't have that kind of UM on her policy and she doesn't have collision either.
| Quote: | | the insurance company . . . then told her she signed a paper to allow them to take her car out of tow and move or transfer it. They paid her nothing on her car, denied her coverage and then sold her car without even notifying her |
I find that completely unbelievable. If she did not have either collision or UMPD, what does the insurance company care about her car? There's nothing for them to pay, so there's nothing they're going to do.
Did she sign any papers at all? If she did, what do they say (she'll have a copy)? Usually, when an insurance company asks a person to "sign papers", there is an exchange of a check for the signature.
Here's the heart of the matter. Either the car is covered for collision or it is not. If the car is covered for collision and is repairable, the insurance company will get it out of the tow yard ASAP and to the body shop for repairs, because it costs money every day it sits in the tow yard. If it's not repairable, they'll get it out and get it to the salvage yard for the same reason (or they'll give the title to the tow yard and let them dispose of it).
But selling a person's car? Insurance companies have no authority to do that unless they have paid a total loss claim and take possession of, and title to, the vehicle. What you state here is impossible. Or it is some kind of huge mistake that could not have happened (only the titled owner can sell the vehicle) and the insurance company owes her some money. But I'm voting in favor of the impossible.
Denying a claim because there is no coverage happens all the time. Many people "think" they're covered when they are not. They fail to read their policy declarations, or they read them and don't understand them, and never call their agent or insurer to inquire. Then they have a claim, only to find out that what coverages they "thought" they had and what they actually have are two different things. (It is especially true of persons who act as their own agent and purchase insurance online, then they have no one to blame but themselves.)
Perhaps something else entirely has happened here. Could it be that the damaged vehicle was repossessed by the lender for non-payment on the loan? If that were the case, unless the vehicle was "sold" for more than the balance of the loan, there is nothing that would be due to the former owner. In a repossession, there is no paperwork that the "owner" signs, there is no notice to the "owner", and the lender can dispose of the vehicle in any manner it chooses, including destruction of the vehicle -- it's their property. And the lender is going to get it out of the tow yard as quickly as it can, too. This is beyond the scope of an insurance policy.
Perhaps your friend is too embarrassed to admit that her wrecked car was also repossessed, and is trying to blame an insurance company for her troubles. That wouldn't be unheard of either. _________________ California-licensed Property & Casualty Broker-Agent and Life & Health Agent. CA Insurance License #0596197. Send me your questions, and I'll send you my answers. I live, breathe, and teach insurance! |
|
MaxHerr
Moderator
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 4218
Location: Pomona CA
162.55 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:09 pm Post subject: not at fault |
|
|
If the driver of the vehicle is not at fault will the insurance pay for the damages if the person who was driving wasn't listed on the policy with UM? _________________ Register Now to have your Insurance queries solved. |
|
Worried Mom
Guest
1.00 Dollars($)
|
|
|
|